In The Spirituality of African Peoples: The
Search for a Common Moral Discourse, ethicist Peter J. Paris takes up a task
to give a detailed explanation of “the common features implicit in the
traditional worldviews of African peoples as foundational for an African and
African American moral philosophy”(Paris 19).
In his efforts, he determines that there is an underlying thread of
spirituality that forms a social ethic of moral virtue for Africans and African
Americans even if both groups may be culturally different (21-22, 129-130, 132,
133, 162). This spirituality, which is consistent
of the interconnected experiential realms of God, community, family, and
personhood in African life, provides the foundation of virtue ethics for
Africans and African Americans (21-22, 129-130).
The origin
of moral virtue within the African and African American experiences can be said
to begin with that which is divine and spiritual, for life is given and
maintained from this realm (25, 28, 33).
At the root of the relationship between the spiritual being(s) and African
peoples, however, is a principle of covenant.
Covenant between the divine and humans considers the idea of sustaining life
on the hand of the divine in exchange for devotion from living people (28, 44). This idea of covenant permeates into the
realm of community which primarily seeks harmony within physical and even
cosmological relationships with ancestors (51, 56), and into the familial realm
which considers all relationships to be reciprocal in respectful accordance to
age-based hierarchy (86-87). Upholding this
network of relationship encourages the production of a person who exemplifies
character that is reflective of the greater good of their community (88,
109-111).
Posing as some
challenges to African spirituality and the moral life that comes from it have
been Western notions and practices that have disturbed and questioned
structures embedded in African communities and people. For example, slavery had a dynamic impact on
both African territory and the embodied souls of those who were exported out of
her bosom (61). Moreover, the Western
focus on individualism has stood as something quite contrary to an African’s
ability to find personal identity in community (11, 114-115). Yet perhaps one of the more significant
notions taken up by Westerners revolves around the Christian conversion of
slaves without the recognition of Africans as humans or their African religion (28,
36, 62-63). Although African Americans
in particular were able to appropriate Christianity to their own African
understanding of spirituality (e.g., developing spirituals and sorrow songs)
and their American experience of slavery (e.g., finding theological justification
for abolitionist efforts), there was no initial care about their well-being as
people or what their own beliefs held (63-67, 29).
Paris’s
focus on the components of African spirituality seems to inform me as an
African American and as a human being about how important—or rather necessary—it
is for these interlocked factors to be in operation in order for a social ethic
of moral virtue to be existent. Without spirituality
that is inclusive of the interconnectedness of God, community, family, and
personhood, the formation of “morally virtuous” character is impossible for African peoples (129-130, 133, 134). Formation of
virtuous character only becomes possible through the intentional and habitual behaviors within the components of African spirituality (133-134). By being a part of a community that esteems covenant
with the sacred through practices and upholds values for family members, the
character of a person has the ability to be developed and understood by those
within the community and be deemed as “good” (89-90, 43-44, 134). Individuals such as Nelson Mandela and Martin
Luther King, Jr. are examples that Paris points to as people who have embodied
these behaviors and have thus been viewed as figures of virtues such as
beneficence, forgiveness, and justice to name a few (136-156). For example, Mandela is recognized for his
neighborly heart for his people in South Africa and towards his former enemies
(139), and King is known for his belief in all people living in “beloved
community” (154). Moreover, Africans and
African Americans have been said to promote forgiveness towards oppressors by
displaying kindness over hatred (148-149).
Imagine how much our world would be different if we were all transformed
by a spirituality that has the ability to yield a virtue such as forgiveness. Think about what it would mean for everyone to
live in a society where they could truly look to their neighbor who is
hospitable enough to share her resources regardless of whether or not she has
enough for herself. Moreover in this
regard, what might equality and justice for all look like?
It
may not have all the answers to insights such as these that have been mentioned; however, I believe that the spirituality of African peoples has moral virtue within it
from which we all can all learn and grow together. It would be wonderful if we could all challenge
ourselves to either be or remain immersed in community that seeks to uphold
relationship with God, neighbors, and family as a means to truly know each
other and to know our true character.
Emulating the practices from African spirituality may be a critical
force in producing moral change in our world.
Paris, Peter J., The Spirituality of African Peoples: The Search for a Common Moral
Discourse.
Minneapolis: Fortress
Press, 1995.
I like that you touched upon Paris' examples of Martin Luther King Jr. and Nelson Mandela, as well as the the African/African American forgiveness piece. Paris' spoke about how African's respect for legal authority and kindness, to Westernizers, provided a justification for why they need to be converted and ruled over. I appreciate your emphasis and standpoint that this kindness is a strength not weakness that could better shape the society.
ReplyDeleteI would have liked to hear more about how forms of justice and equality would be shaped when the age based hierarchy is taken into account.
Also, an area for further inquiry may be to explore other collective government systems (communism/socialism) that might resemble afrocentric justice.
I like how well you present Paris’ argument concerning the necessity of interconnectedness of God, Community, family and personhood for a morally virtuous character to be possible. However, I wonder if you really think that it is impossible to have a virtuous moral character with out the interconnectedness of the aforementioned factors. It seems a bit harsh to me for Paris to say that Africans and members of the diaspora cannot be morally virtuous without connectedness. Of course community and connectedness are important and allow for moral virtue to flourish, but is it really impossible without it? It would be great to see some pushback on this assumption, and doing so may be able to provide us with more ways to promote community.
ReplyDeleteRobert, your grasp of Paris' arguments is strong. I especially liked the way you included virtue ethics as a product of African spirituality and the inability to cultivate morality outside of the necessary interdependence of God, family, community and person. As I read your post, I wondered how this might be personal for you? How have you seen morality compromised in your own experiences in the African American community? Are there any political or social manifestations of this pervasive problem that you are particularly passionate about?
ReplyDeleteAdditionally, how do you contend with the vagueness of Paris' assertions, i.e. the lack of specificity on region in his research. Do you think the same ethics are prevalent in all countries in Africa and all descendants?